"JOB KILLER" Stay at Home Order Gov. Newsom Time to Reopen California

Job Killer California Gov. Newsom - Time to reopen California and stop Killing Businesses, with your "Stay at Home Order," that maybe violating Constitutional Civil Liberties, Constitutional Equal Protections and imposes Restraint of Business Trade.

Because the California Constitution mandates in part at Article 1 Section 1, the following:

"All people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights. Among these are enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy.”   (Sec. 1 added Nov. 5, 1974, by Proposition 7. Resolution Chapter 90, 1974.)  

Source: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=CONS&division=&title=&part=&chapter=&article=I

Gov. Newsom your Executive Order N-33-20 "Stay at Home Order," does in fact hurt the ability of employers to retain individual employees. 

https://www.gov.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/3.19.20-attested-EO-N-33-20-COVID-19-HEALTH-ORDER.pdf

Finally, the question then becomes is your "Stay at Home Order,"  unconstitutional? 

  

Time to Reopen California!

Congressional District 25 Special Election Results Garcia vs Smith

Click on below Link to watch Live Results of LA County Election Results - "Congressional District 25," Special Election, May 12, 2020, in the political battle for CD25 Seat: Garcia v. Smith:


https://results.lavote.net/#year=2020&election=4178

https://results.lavote.net/text-results/4178 

Why Isn't the Media Covering "Military & Overseas Voter Ballots" that will be (Rejected) Destroyed during the 2020 November Presidential General Election? Military Lives Matter!

Updated 9/26/2020, Saturday - Palmdale, California

For Immediate Release 

 

Military Mail-in Ballots "BREAKING" -  "FBI Finds Multiple Military Ballots Cast for Trump Discarded."  9/24/2020

Sources:  https://theconservativeopinion.com/breaking-fbi-finds-multiple-pa-military-ballots-cast-for-trump-discarded/

Revised Statement Of U.S. Attorney Freed On Inquiry Into Reports Of Potential Issues With Mail-In Ballots -9/24/20

According to US DOJ, "...At this point we can confirm that a small number of military ballots were discarded.   Investigators have recovered nine ballots at this time.  Some of those ballots can be attributed to specific voters and some cannot.  Of the nine ballots that were discarded and then recovered, 7 were cast for presidential candidate Donald Trump. 

 

Two of the discarded ballots had been resealed inside their appropriate envelopes by Luzerne elections staff prior to recovery by the FBI and the contents of those 2 ballots are unknown."...

Source: https://www.justice.gov/usao-mdpa/pr/revised-statement-us-attorney-freed-inquiry-reports-potential-issues-mail-ballots

 

(2014)

Year 2014 did you know California Rejected 12% Military & Overseas Ballots and 84% of Military & Overseas Ballots were listed as unreturned.

 

Source:  https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/data-visualizations/2014/elections-performance-index#state-CA

(2016)

Military Mail-In Ballots: Did you know that in the 2016 Presidential Primary Election, County of Los Angeles, Rejected - "Destroyed" 417 Military & Overseas Mail-In Ballots? 

Below email evidence speaks for itself.   

To enlarge email, move the hand cursor over photo below and click one time:  

 

"SEX IN COURTHOUSES"

With the growing public outcry from women, other genders who have been sexually harassed, groped, forcefully kissed, perhaps it is time to turn the spotlight on sex in the courthouses.  

Many are aware the courthouses are home to judges who are also lawyers with tremendous power over ordinary American Citizen's, with power to send a person to jail, take real and personal property away, sanction or fine a person, award custody of one's child[ren], to remove parental rights; which is tremendous power sometimes in the wrong hands can be used for the wrong purpose and abused power.


How many persons are in fear of mental or physical retaliation for speaking up against a Judge or Lawyer, who has abused his or her power?  

RULES (POLICY GUIDELINES) THAT DO NOT MAKE ANY COMMON SENSE

• Cause and Effect 

A long-standing ethics rule of the State Bar of Arizona allows attorneys to have sexual relations with their client[s] as long as a “consensual sexual relationship existed between them when the client-lawyer relationship commenced” pursuant to the State Bar’s Ethical Rule 1.8(j), also known as ER 1.8(j), has many asking questions as to whether this ethical rule is actually encouraging improper attorney-client relationships to occur of (Sexual Harassment's)... 

Sadly this Ethical Rule 1.8(j) does not exclude minor children from being sexually harassed or sexually assaulted by lawyers who represent them, as minors.  Visit: https://www.azbar.org/for-lawyers/ethics/rules-of-professional-conduct/ 

However, the question is how many adults and minor children are out there within Arizona, are afraid to speak up about being subjected to sexual harassment (assault) or sexual trafficking, because the State Bar of Arizona Ethical Rule 1.8(j), allows sexual harassment camouflaged as consensual sex, as long as a “consensual sexual relationship existed between them when the client-lawyer relationship commenced?”


When being faced by someone or some persons attempting to violate your human rights, immediately seek help from someone you trust and can confide, for help to prevent becoming a victim of Sexual Assault, Sexual Harassment or Rape. 

The State Bar of Arizona, you're a disgrace for allowing your Ethical Rule 1.8(j) to remain on your books as a policy-rule,  which promotes Sexual Harassment and beyond!

Star Moffatt, CEO of Moffatt Media (M&M), Investigative Journalist/Former "Top Two" California State Senate Candidate (2012). 

www.moffattmedia.com

Star@moffattmedia.com 

Part2

 

"MILITARY & OVERSEAS VOTER BALLOTS" HOW MANY WILL BE (REJECTED) TRASHED, DURING 2020 CALIFORNIA PRIMARY ELECTION?

 

JUST ANOTHER CLERK PUTTING ON A JUDGES ROBE

Did you know that Peter L. Shaw, Commissioner with the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, is nothing more than a Clerk putting on a Judges Robe.