STRESS

Everyday of my life is filled with stress, it is how I react to control either the good or bad stress!

CORRUPT JUSTICE

How are you going to spearhead justice when you are a corrupt justice?

Sex in Arizona Attorney Association

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 

By: Star Moffatt, star@moffattlawfirm.com
Star Moffatt, Spokesperson
PUBLISHED: April 19, 2017
Updated: April 27, 2018


_________________________________________________________________________________

Did you know the State Bar of Arizona-(Attorney Trade Association), allows  its Arizona Attorney  members, to have "consensual sex," with their legal clients? 

State Bar of Arizona:

Ethical Rule 1.8(j) reads:  "A lawyer shall not have sexual relations with a client unless a consensual sexual relationship existed between them when the client-lawyer relationship commenced." Reference Source: http://www.azbar.org/Ethics/RulesofProfessionalConduct/ViewRule?id=28

Final question:  Since Arizona attorneys are allowed to have "consensual sex" with their legal client[s], then should an attorney lose his or her professional occupational attorneys license and livelihood just for asking of a "selfie-nude" photo, from a non-legal client?

California Bar 
Now look at the position the "California Bar" has taken to "ban" ..."sex between lawyers and their clients.  See Reference Source by Associated Press:   

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/11/27/california-considers-ban-on-sex-between-lawyers-and-clients.html 

Tags:
#California Bar
#State Bar of Arizona
#Arizona

State Bar of California challenged by Women's Civil Rights Attorney

 BREAKING NEWS ALERT FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

  Patricia Barry is challenging her disbarment before the Federal U. S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals against California State Supreme Court and State Bar of California.

 

 

In 1986, Barry argued the first sexual harassment case in U. S. Supreme Court, Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57 (1986) in which Justice Rehnquist writing for unanimous court held that environmental harassment like quid pro quo harassment is gender discrimination. Barry also won Vinson v. Taylor, 753 F.2d 141 (D.C. Cir. 1985) which was the case challenged in the Supreme Court sub nomine Meritor.

Historically, April 11, 2017, Tuesday, at 2:30pm Commissioner Peter Shaw of the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in Courtroom 2, at 95 Seventh St, San Francisco will conduct a hearing as to whether Patricia Barry, Women’s / Civil Rights Attorney should be disbarred from practice in the Federal Ninth Circuit Court, based on disbarment by the California Supreme Court, initiated by the State Bar of California.  Barry was admitted to the Ninth Circuit Bar in June 1985. Barry had practiced for 41-1/2 years in both state and federal court when the Court disbarred her.

According to Barry, in each of the three cases on which the disbarment is based Barry represented a domestic violence victim trying to regain custody of her child(ren) from the abuser, Carol Mardeusz in July 2000; Darla Elwood in 2002 through 2006; Michele Fotinos, 2010 to the present time.

In the Marduesz case the complaining witness was Marin judge Verna Adams, who found Barry in contempt in July 2000 in part because she objected to the prosecutor’s badgering of Mardeusz stating truthfully that Mardeusz was a victim of domestic violence. When Barry stated that Mardeusz was a victim of domestic violence Judge Adams immediately ordered the bailiff to place Barry in a holding cell in front of the jury.

Barry also went on to say the following, “that in the Elwood case, the complaining witness was Joseph Morin, the father of two of Elwood’s children, whom Barry had sued. He is a child batterer (there are declarations from Elwood’s two older children who described his abuse).

Morin also engaged in racial violence (settled the case for a substantial amount of money) and in addition, threatened to kill a woman who he believed was a lesbian (she was) (she had obtained a two year restraining order against him based in part on his death threats against her).

In the Fotinos case, the bar witness is Betsy Kimball who defended a San Mateo attorney Stephen Montalvo whom Barry was suing because he committed gross malpractice and fraud against Fotinos. In 2012 when Barry served Montalvo with the legal malpractice/fraud complaint, the Bar appointed Kimball to the legal malpractice insurance committee.

Montalvo took $70,000 from Fotinos and left her with no kids, no community property, and $67 a month in child support. Barry had not paid $4,275 in discovery sanctions to him and $1,500 to the Court because Fotinos had no money to pay attorney fees to Barry. The Bar prosecutor found that Barry lacked the funds to pay the attorney and the Court the sanctions. 

The judge entered a judgment in the Montalvo lawsuit which did not include the sanctions orders.  Nonpayment of discovery and judicial sanctions, although not included in the judgment, is the primary reason the Bar disbarred Barry.”

On April 11, 2017, Patricia Barry must prove (1) a deprivation of due process; (2) insufficient proof of misconduct; or (3) grave injustice which would result from the imposition of such discipline.

Unfortunately throughout our nation, attorneys are now coming under attack by Bar Associations who are interfering with  Constitutional Rights (Freedom of Speech), which also applies to attorneys when they defend in court pleadings vigorously for their clients.

Thus, without Barry to defend the defenseless in both Federal and State courts our country will become a darker place! 

For media inquiries contact Star Moffatt, Spokeswoman Moffatt Law Firm – star@moffattlawfirm.com

Tags:
#State Bar of California, #Patricia Barry, #Ninth Circuit Court, #Disbar, #Freedom of Speech, #Deprivation, #Civil Rights.

                                                   ### 

Judiciary Democracy Abated

No judge or person is above the law.   When a judge acts with absolute power, than Tyranny is created and judiciary democracy is abated. - Star Moffatt

Click on the Link below and watch a short (1 minute) Trailer Video, titled "Absolute Power" of Attorneys who speak out on Corruptness and Corrupt Judge William J. O'Neil:

https://youtu.be/Bj5EXFNp0g0

EMPOWERMENT OF EDUCATION!

They say, Education is the key to success.  

However and more importantly the "empowerment of education," will teach you to have your eyes wide open with being able to read, write and comprehend, by preventing thieves stealing from you! Tribute to little JD.

Arizona Attorneys Denied Constitutional Rights

Did you know that “Arizona Attorneys” are being denied their constitutional rights? 

 

Arizona Attorneys have lost their Constitutional Rights and Constitutional Protections through the use of “Sui Generis” disciplinary proceedings conducted by State Supreme Court Presiding Disciplinary Judge William J. O’Neil.  The use of “Sui Generis” by Judge O’Neil in disciplinary proceedings over attorneys throughout the State of Arizona gives Judge O’Neil unprecedented “absolute power” over the right of every Arizona attorney to practice law!

Purported State Supreme Court Presiding Disciplinary Judge William J. O'Neil has even admitted in public his use of "Sui Generis" Disciplinary proceedings when disciplining attorneys throughout the State of Arizona.   Judge O’Neil has also even admitted he does not abide by civil or criminal law proceedings, he uses “Sui Generis,” processes.

 

See State Supreme Court Rule 48(a) reads in pertinent part:

“Nature of Proceedings. Discipline … are neither civil nor criminal, but are Sui Generis."   

17A Pt. 2 A. R. S. Sup. Ct. Rules, Rule 48, AZ ST S CT Rule 48

Current with amendments received through 11/15/16

"Sui Generis" Disciplinary Proceedings, taking place against all Arizona Attorneys, is the type of proceedings expected from a barbaric third-world country. Only a country led by dictatorship would not uphold or support constitutional rights of due process and equal protection. You wouldn’t believe such actions were taking place in the U.S.  

 

Now for the layperson “Sui Generis” is a method of, make up laws as you go.   Now imagine being charged for a crime and without an approved set of criminal laws to give you equal protection of your constitutional rights.    

According to Law 360, “Sui Generis” Latin express terms a law student if “taught properly learns never to use in legal writing.”… See URL Link: https://www.law360.com/articles/438426/sui-generis-at-supreme-court

Question Presented: Why is the State Bar of Arizona and the Court using "Sui Generis" proceedings “of its own kind or class” to discipline Arizona attorneys?

As a result Arizona attorneys have less rights than and are subjected to worse treatment in legal proceedings involving their right to hold a professional attorney bar license than the legal proceedings brought against illegal-criminal aliens found crossing over our country’s border. 

Already numerous Arizona Attorneys have lost their bar license through this unique and highly unusual practice, isn’t it time for Jeff Sessions, DOJ United States Attorney General and other relevant courts to intervene and step up to the plate in protecting the Constitutional Rights of Arizona Attorneys?   

The removal of Arizona Attorneys Constitutional Rights and Constitutional Protections sets even our nation back in time; a time even before implementation of Constitutional Bill of Rights applicable to all American Citizens including Arizona Attorneys; to a time when we were subjects of Britain.

###