Arizona Attorneys Denied Constitutional Rights

Did you know that “Arizona Attorneys” are being denied their constitutional rights? 

 

Arizona Attorneys have lost their Constitutional Rights and Constitutional Protections through the use of “Sui Generis” disciplinary proceedings conducted by State Supreme Court Presiding Disciplinary Judge William J. O’Neil.  The use of “Sui Generis” by Judge O’Neil in disciplinary proceedings over attorneys throughout the State of Arizona gives Judge O’Neil unprecedented “absolute power” over the right of every Arizona attorney to practice law!

Purported State Supreme Court Presiding Disciplinary Judge William J. O'Neil has even admitted in public his use of "Sui Generis" Disciplinary proceedings when disciplining attorneys throughout the State of Arizona.   Judge O’Neil has also even admitted he does not abide by civil or criminal law proceedings, he uses “Sui Generis,” processes.

 

See State Supreme Court Rule 48(a) reads in pertinent part:

“Nature of Proceedings. Discipline … are neither civil nor criminal, but are Sui Generis."   

17A Pt. 2 A. R. S. Sup. Ct. Rules, Rule 48, AZ ST S CT Rule 48

Current with amendments received through 11/15/16

"Sui Generis" Disciplinary Proceedings, taking place against all Arizona Attorneys, is the type of proceedings expected from a barbaric third-world country. Only a country led by dictatorship would not uphold or support constitutional rights of due process and equal protection. You wouldn’t believe such actions were taking place in the U.S.  

 

Now for the layperson “Sui Generis” is a method of, make up laws as you go.   Now imagine being charged for a crime and without an approved set of criminal laws to give you equal protection of your constitutional rights.    

According to Law 360, “Sui Generis” Latin express terms a law student if “taught properly learns never to use in legal writing.”… See URL Link: https://www.law360.com/articles/438426/sui-generis-at-supreme-court

Question Presented: Why is the State Bar of Arizona and the Court using "Sui Generis" proceedings “of its own kind or class” to discipline Arizona attorneys?

As a result Arizona attorneys have less rights than and are subjected to worse treatment in legal proceedings involving their right to hold a professional attorney bar license than the legal proceedings brought against illegal-criminal aliens found crossing over our country’s border. 

Already numerous Arizona Attorneys have lost their bar license through this unique and highly unusual practice, isn’t it time for Jeff Sessions, DOJ United States Attorney General and other relevant courts to intervene and step up to the plate in protecting the Constitutional Rights of Arizona Attorneys?   

The removal of Arizona Attorneys Constitutional Rights and Constitutional Protections sets even our nation back in time; a time even before implementation of Constitutional Bill of Rights applicable to all American Citizens including Arizona Attorneys; to a time when we were subjects of Britain.

###

 

"Citizen's Demand" the Criminal Indictment of William J. O'Neil - Fake Arizona State Supreme Court Judge

 "Fake Judge, Fake Oath" Now Time to Go!

Click on below Link to sign the Petition, if you care in stopping "O'Neil" with prosecuting from the Arizona State Supreme Court Bench, while also wearing a Judges Robe.

Note, O'Neil's "Oath" is so fake O'Neil did not even sign his own "Oath" back in year 2011, wow!

Click on the below to read more!

Sign the Petition and please share. 

Join "Citizen's Demand" the Criminal Indictment of William J. O'Neil.

https://www.change.org/p/james-comey-citizen-s-demand-criminal-indictment-of-william-j-o-neil-impersonating-judge

Fake "Oath" of William J. O'Neil

"Citizen's Demand" Criminal Indictment of  William J. O'Neil for (Impersonating) being a Supreme Court Judge in Arizona, by wearing a Judges Robe.
 
William J. O'Neil, since approximately year 2011, has purported being an Arizona State Supreme Court Presiding Disciplinary Judge, however, he is nothing more than a "Fake Judge." 

Why a "Fake Judge:"   Because O'Neil does not even have a valid "Oath,"  that bears O'Neil's affixed  genuine handwritten signature on his purported "Oath." 

See O'Neil's "Fake" Oath attached here:

 

CITIZEN'S DEMAND - "REAL TALK-REAL FACTS": "True American's"

CITIZEN'S DEMAND - "REAL TALK-REAL FACTS": "True American's": “True American’s” don’t stand for Lawlessness or Corruptness!

"True American's"

“True American’s” don’t stand for Lawlessness or Corruptness! ~Star Moffatt

United States a "Lawless" Nation

Defiance

What I find so amazing is that our country has become such a “lawless Nation,” exhibiting defiance of honesty and integrity.

What a dam shame that the Democrats feel so good about intentionally delaying the confirmation of Jeff Sessions as our next U.S. Attorney General. 

However, I bet you the same Democrats participating in delaying “Sessions Confirmation” are the same Democrats who are in church every Sunday, claiming to be Christians!

Arizona Lawyers Disbarred for Standing up against "illegal Immigration"...

A

rizona Lawyers on the “Battlefield" standing up against "illegal Immigration"...Disbarred by Arizona

LANCASTER, CA, USA, January 1, 2017

Courts were very liberal, didn’t want to enforce illegal immigration laws…Attorneys are afraid to actually represent their clients aggressively, because they are afraid of what the Bar might do to them,” says Lisa Aubuchon, Former Arizona Deputy County Attorney.


Rachel Alexander, whose professional career in Arizona also consisted of the following: Assistant Attorney General, Deputy County Attorney and Special Assistant for Maricopa County Attorney’s Office. 

Alexander goes on to say, she was suspended for writing an article about Arizona with Fox News; and for placing her name on a Federal Civil Racketeering (“RICO”) lawsuit with Maricopa County Sheriff Arpaio, related to a Court Tower.     Alexander also said, she was suspended for one year and a day, which is essentially a Defacto Disbarment.



Jeffrey Moffatt, Federal Attorney – Censured for telling a judge in Washington, D.C. that he and Secretary of the Veterans Administration, should be criminally prosecuted for denying a Veteran his Benefits…

Click on the below Video Link, to see interviews with Alexander, Aubuchon and Moffatt by Ernie White.
Video Produced by Ernie White Media Productions

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAbNa3XR3s4&feature=youtu.be 

William J. O’Neil, State Supreme Court of Arizona Presiding Disciplinary Judge, has publicly warned Arizona attorneys “you don’t want to come before me!”

O’Neil has also gone on the record to say, that when an attorney is disciplined by the Court and “cites criminal and civil laws” as defenses, they don’t apply in his court room. Disciplinary proceedings for Arizona attorneys are different and unique, because the Court uses “Sui-Generis” Disciplinary proceedings.


Consequently, -- “Sui generis is one of those Latin expressed terms a student is introduced to in law school and, if taught properly, learns never to use in legal writing.


Sui generis is clearly what Justice Elena Kagan and three other justices think about two recent decisions of the United States Supreme Court in Comcast Corp. v. Behrend, 569 U.S. ___, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 2544 (2013) and Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. Symczyk, 569 U.S. ___, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 3157 (2013). Justice Kagan explains in her dissenting opinion in”... Source: http://www.law360.com/articles/438426/sui-generis-at-supreme-court


Note, Lisa Aubuchon, Deputy County Attorney was admitted to the Arizona Bar in year 1990 and Andrew Thomas, Maricopa County Attorney was admitted to the Arizona Bar in year 1991, yet both were disbarred by a person not admitted to practice law in Arizona. 

Rachel Alexander was admitted to the Arizona Bar year 2000, also suspended by the same person not admitted to practice law in Arizona.


The same person not admitted to practice law in Arizona also wrote a 247 pages, Opinion and Order Imposing Sanctions against (Aubuchon/Thomas) and against (Alexander), dated April 10, 2012, Case No.: PDJ-2011-9002.   


The Opinion and Order Imposing Sanctions, also appears not to have been signed by the non-licensed Arizona attorney, with his own handwritten signature to authenticate such "Opinion and Order Imposing Sanctions."


Needless to say, both Alexander and Aubuchon, were questioned why the 247 Pages Opinion & Order Imposing Sanctions was not authenticated by the person not admitted to practice law in Arizona, they responded in a consensus: “no matter what defense motions we submitted, no matter what evidence we submitted each and every single piece of defense evidence and discovery offered, were all “DENIED” by O’Neil and the Court. 


CONCLUSION

If Aubuchon, Alexander and Thomas want reinstatement of their Bar cards, they are required to Stipulate disciplinary - “costs and expenses…jointly and severally…in the amount of $101,292.75.”


QUESTIONS PRESENTED

Doesn’t it appear to you, that Arizona Attorneys are treated worse than illegal Criminal Aliens, who cross the Mexico Border on a daily basis into Arizona?


Whether attorney Bar[s] / Courts can suspend or disbar a person from practice of law in conflict to U.S. Constitutional protections, found within 5th and 14th Amendments of the U.S. Constitution?


Law 360 says, in part “Sui Generis…Latin expressed terms a student is introduced to in law school… learns never to use in legal writing.” Now for those reasonable minded “True American Citizen’s,” if Law 360 says NEVER to use “Sui Generis” in legal writing[s], then why is O’Neil and Court,  having a pattern and practice to discipline Arizona Attorneys with “Sui Generis” disciplinary proceedings?


Do you believe any attorney disciplined by a Bar Association, Tax Exempt Organization or a Non-Profit Organization, that uses “Sui Generis” disciplinary proceedings, is deprived of procedural due processes, applicable to both Federal and State Constitutional protections?


Whether “Sui Generis” disciplinary proceedings create a new body of Law?


Final questions, to other persons holding professional licenses, how would you feel if you came under discipline proceedings by your supposed regulatory agency and they assigned a person not licensed to discipline and prosecute you?


Would you also feel injustice has reared its ugly head, because your professional license was either Suspended or Revoked, by someone not licensed within your professional field; thereby taking away your livelihood and food off your table from you and your family?

                                

For media inquiries, contact Star Moffatt, Spokeswoman for Law Offices of Jeffrey Moffatt (Moffatt Law Firm), Investigative Journalist and California State Senate Candidate 2012/2016 at: star@jeffmoffattlawfirm.com, star@mofffattlawfirm.com or telephone (661) 945-6121.